<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should we continue to support the Muslim Journal when it ignores the letters defending the character of Imam W. D. Mohammed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://siddeeq.com/2008/12/03/should-we-continue-to-support-the-muslim-journal-when-it-ignores-the-letters-defending-the-character-of-imam-w-d-mohammed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://siddeeq.com/2008/12/03/should-we-continue-to-support-the-muslim-journal-when-it-ignores-the-letters-defending-the-character-of-imam-w-d-mohammed/</link>
	<description>A dialogue on Islamic leadership, accountability and justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:43:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: brother khalid</title>
		<link>http://siddeeq.com/2008/12/03/should-we-continue-to-support-the-muslim-journal-when-it-ignores-the-letters-defending-the-character-of-imam-w-d-mohammed/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>brother khalid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 16:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siddeeq.com/?p=18#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 33, Number 254:
Narrated &#039;Ali bin Al-Husain (from Safiya, the Prophet&#039;s wife):
The wives of the Prophet were with him in the mosque (while he was in Itikaf) and then they departed and the Prophet said to Safiya bint Huyai, &quot;Don&#039;t hurry up, for I shall accompany you,&quot; (and her dwelling was in the house of Usama). The Prophet went out and in the meantime two Ansari men met him and they looked at the Prophet and passed by. The Prophet said to them, &quot;Come here. She is (my wife) Safiya bint Huyai.&quot; They replied, &quot;Subhan Allah, (How dare we think of evil) O Allah&#039;s Apostle! (we never expect anything bad from you).&quot; The Prophet replied, &quot;Satan circulates in the human being as blood circulates in the body, and I was afraid lest Satan might insert an evil thought in your minds.&quot;
This simple act on the part of our beloved Prophet, peace and prayers upon him, shows the critical importance of clearing any possibility that one&#039;s character be put into question. The insidious behaviour displayed on the &#039;Shirley Mohammad and friends show&#039; demonstrates absolutely NO concern for Imam Muhammad&#039;s honor. That is why dear brother Siddeeq you are absolutely, positively 100% correct to say that this is a MAJOR concern and MUST be reconciled because it is concerning our Imams honor and reputation. Instead of meeting in Louisville, these kentucky chicken Imams should be waging Jihad to defend Imam Mohammad&#039;s honor by coming out and giving their PUBLIC support to the Imams &quot;LEGAL&quot; wife Khadijah!!!
How would it look in the future when people say that this was never challenged by The Imams???
What would be the story surrounding Imam Mohammad&#039;s &quot;Mystery woman&quot; he lived and traveled with. Astaghfirullah!! How can we expect these people to uphold truth when they fail to deal with something so simple as to speak a word against this Blatant LIE! You have to make a strong effort to ignore that. How do you have the courage to be silent on such a matter?
You may not say it but I will. Muslim Journal is a sheepish paper until it deals with it&#039;s silence and censorship of those who voice concern.
&quot;Kentucky Chicken Imams&quot; (to whom the shoe fits)
&quot;buk buk raark&quot; And I&#039;m not Laughing at all :(
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 33, Number 254:<br />
Narrated &#8216;Ali bin Al-Husain (from Safiya, the Prophet&#8217;s wife):<br />
The wives of the Prophet were with him in the mosque (while he was in Itikaf) and then they departed and the Prophet said to Safiya bint Huyai, &#8220;Don&#8217;t hurry up, for I shall accompany you,&#8221; (and her dwelling was in the house of Usama). The Prophet went out and in the meantime two Ansari men met him and they looked at the Prophet and passed by. The Prophet said to them, &#8220;Come here. She is (my wife) Safiya bint Huyai.&#8221; They replied, &#8220;Subhan Allah, (How dare we think of evil) O Allah&#8217;s Apostle! (we never expect anything bad from you).&#8221; The Prophet replied, &#8220;Satan circulates in the human being as blood circulates in the body, and I was afraid lest Satan might insert an evil thought in your minds.&#8221;<br />
This simple act on the part of our beloved Prophet, peace and prayers upon him, shows the critical importance of clearing any possibility that one&#8217;s character be put into question. The insidious behaviour displayed on the &#8216;Shirley Mohammad and friends show&#8217; demonstrates absolutely NO concern for Imam Muhammad&#8217;s honor. That is why dear brother Siddeeq you are absolutely, positively 100% correct to say that this is a MAJOR concern and MUST be reconciled because it is concerning our Imams honor and reputation. Instead of meeting in Louisville, these kentucky chicken Imams should be waging Jihad to defend Imam Mohammad&#8217;s honor by coming out and giving their PUBLIC support to the Imams &#8220;LEGAL&#8221; wife Khadijah!!!<br />
How would it look in the future when people say that this was never challenged by The Imams???<br />
What would be the story surrounding Imam Mohammad&#8217;s &#8220;Mystery woman&#8221; he lived and traveled with. Astaghfirullah!! How can we expect these people to uphold truth when they fail to deal with something so simple as to speak a word against this Blatant LIE! You have to make a strong effort to ignore that. How do you have the courage to be silent on such a matter?<br />
You may not say it but I will. Muslim Journal is a sheepish paper until it deals with it&#8217;s silence and censorship of those who voice concern.<br />
&#8220;Kentucky Chicken Imams&#8221; (to whom the shoe fits)<br />
&#8220;buk buk raark&#8221; And I&#8217;m not Laughing at all <img src='http://siddeeq.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
